New Lyme Site, New Lyme, Ohio
Ashtabula Co., OH, USA
Panoramic Photo Collage
1991
27 x 29
New Lyme in Ashtabula County represents another node in northeastern Ohio’s toxic corridor where industrial waste disposal concentrated in rural townships bearing disproportionate contamination burdens during decades of inadequate environmental oversight. The site exemplifies how working-class communities absorbed costs from industries serving broader regional economies while lacking political influence to resist dumping or demand corporate accountability.
Ashtabula County’s concentration of at least seven EPA Superfund sites—New Lyme, Big D Campground, Field Brook Stream, Republic Steel Quarry among them—created what amounted to normalized contamination rather than exceptional disaster. This clustering reflected the county’s industrial base generating hazardous waste, its rural character enabling remote illegal dumping away from urban regulatory oversight, and its working-class demographics limiting community capacity to resist facility siting or enforce cleanup obligations.
The New Lyme site posed documentary challenges: how does photography reveal contamination manifesting through invisible groundwater chemistry rather than visible surface features? The landscape lacked visual drama—no spectacular ruins, no residential neighborhoods, no nationally-recognized disaster narrative. The ordinariness was the point. Without documentation, such sites would remain known only to affected communities and EPA records, excluded from environmental narratives privileging spectacular disasters over everyday injustices.
Hayashi’s nearly-square format documents contamination pervading entire bounded spaces rather than following directional pathways. The formal strategy parallels the site’s geographic reality: disposal areas where toxins concentrated before migrating through soil and water to affect broader regions. The composition insists on contamination’s spatial dimensions—pollution saturating landscapes, not isolated to discrete industrial facilities.
New Lyme illustrates environmental inequality’s fundamental pattern: industries externalized waste disposal costs onto vulnerable communities while capturing profits from operations those communities hosted. Rural townships provided convenient dumping locations distant from regulatory scrutiny. When contamination required cleanup, federal Superfund programs bore costs rather than corporations that benefited. Hayashi’s commitment to photographing such obscure sites demonstrated dedication to comprehensive documentation insisting that ordinary environmental injustices affecting working-class communities deserve equal attention to spectacular disasters attracting media coverage.